Ignoring the problem was
simply not an option, according to Mullin. The cost of cleaning
and repainting bird-fouled areas was considerable, and the birds
themselves created an unpleasant atmosphere for the more than
two million annual visitors to the stadium. Not to mention that
bird droppings and dead birds were a significant health concern.
The stadium’s location on the Ohio River meant dried excrement
easily became airborne. And if droppings ever met concession
areas, health officials could conceivably shut down concession
operations.
The problem evolved after city
and county officials successfully blocked pigeons from roosting
under overpasses near the stadium. “The city placed netting on
walkways and overpasses outside the stadium, and the birds moved
to the stadium,” said Mullin.
Mullin’s options were limited
by local ordnances on how businesses can deal with bird
infestations. Poisoning and shooting were prohibited, as were
bird spikes, even though they are not a lethal option, just an
uncomfortable roost inhibitor. Mullin’s team tried noise
deterrents and plastic owls.
“They laughed at us,” recalled
Mullin. “The birds pooped on the plastic owls.” For the Great
American Ball Park, netting was the answer. The netting was easy
to work with and install, said Mullin. He chose polypropylene, a
lightweight but heavy duty netting that is UV stabilized for
longevity of up to 20 years and nearly invisible from a
distance, so it doesn’t distract from the stadium’s
architectural appeal.
After installation in February
in preparation of opening day on April 2, Mullin said the park
saw a “dramatic change by mid-May.”
A few states away in Nebraska,
the operations staff at the University of Nebraska— Kearney
fought a similar battle. Nestled in a pastoral setting 130 miles
west of Lincoln, the university is home to 6,500 students.
Because of the campus’ proximity to corn and wheat fields, the
grounds were a favorite of crows seeking the plentiful food
supply nearby.
They seemed especially fond of
the university’s athletic facilities, where they roosted under
the stadium bleachers and nested on the athletic fields,
according to Lee McQueen, UNK’s facilities director.
“The problem was so bad that
people used umbrellas to protect themselves from bird droppings
while walking across campus, because the birds roosted in every
tree,” McQueen recalls. Toys at a nearby daycare center were
regularly rendered useless because they were covered in
droppings. University grounds keepers patrolled the campus after
dark, beating metal tubs with spatulas to try to scare the crows
away. After a few years of crow occupation, the campus was
buried beneath the build up.
Desperate, university
officials began seeking solutions. Their quest led them to
Bird-X, which not only sold the university the products needed
to rid the campus of crows, but also provided advice on how to
keep the birds from returning once they left. The solution for
the university was a combination of high-tech and low-tech
devices.
Ultrasonic and sonic repellers
– devices that produce both high and low frequency sound waves –
were placed around campus. The sounds generated by the devices
can range from noise that simply annoys the birds to sounds that
mimic the cries of predators or the distress calls of injured
birds.
Ultrasonics create sounds that
are inaudible to humans but are highly distressing to birds,
Zemsky says. Most of the devices offer multiple volume settings
and can be set to generate a varying range of noises that are
offensive to birds.
In addition to installing
sound repellers, staff sprayed trees with a nontoxic but tacky
liquid bird repellant. Next, they positioned large commercial
grade visual devices specifically designed to scare pest birds –
huge spheres festooned with holographic owl faces – around the
campus. Within three months, of starting the treatment, the
crows left.
No Harm, No Fowl
Mullin and McQueen solved
their bird problems the right way, with non-lethal methods, said
Bird-X’s Zemsky. “Not only are lethal methods prohibited in many
areas, they are also doomed to failure. Killing the birds may
appear to eliminate the problem, but really all you are doing is
creating an opportunity for more birds to move in.”
Non-lethal methods work
long-term, because they teach birds that a location is
undesirable.
“Birds are very smart, and
they are creatures of habit. If you can convince them that a
location is no longer safe for them, they will leave and not
return,” says Zemsky. Mullin agrees that making the stadium
inhospitable to the birds was the key.
“Our contacts at the
Cincinnati Zoo kept telling us we had to completely disrupt the
birds’ roosting patterns; otherwise, they would just keep coming
back.”
Effective repellant measures
include taste aversion, which convinces the birds a food supply
in a given area is no longer viable; sight and sound aversion,
which makes them believe an area is unsafe; and physical
barriers, such as netting or spikes that prevent birds from
occupying favorite roosts.